Home » Unemployment

Category Archives: Unemployment

Search this site…

Subscribe RSS feed

August 2019
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Still the same

Official unemployment rate has gone down dramatically, but the improvement of labor market has been largely fake, as the employment-population ratio hasn’t moved much since recession ended.  See this sharp chart from John Taylor at Stanford.

emp-pop-feb-2014

You can also take a longer term perspective at this ratio below:

emp-pop ratio time series

Feel puzzled? You can find out the reason why unemployment rate and the employment-population ratio tend to diverge during this reovery here.

 

The unemployment puzzle

The official unemployment rate has been dropping:

 

Yet, employment to population ratio shows nothing has really improved:

 

So what to believe?  Is US labor market thawing?  Or are we still in a slump?

 

The official unemployment rate is calculated as the number of unemployed divided by labor force.  Let’s use an example to illustrate.   An economy has a total labor force of 100; if 10 is unemployed, then the unemployment rate is 10/100=10%.

To understand the issue, we need to appreciate how the labor force is calculated.  If 3 out of 10 people who are previously unemployed drop out of labor force, because they are discouraged by not being able to find a job for quite some time, labor force now changes from 100 to 97.  And the new unemployment rate is (10-3)/(100-3)=7/97=7.2%. This represents a 2.8% improvement, although the labor market condition has not improved at all.

Is this what’s happening now in the US?  If so, it will show up in labor participation rate, which is defined as the ratio between total labor force and adult population.  And let’s assume the adult population is 150.  When there are discouraged workers giving up and exiting the labor market,  labor participation rate drops from 100/150=67% to 97/150=65%.

Not surprisingly, that is what we see in the real data:

Get real perspective on America’s unemployment

Wells Fargo has a nice chart depicting the relationship between real GDP growth and the change of unemployment rate, the so-called Okun’s Law:

[singlepic id=40 w=400 h=300 float=]

The two are negatively correlated.  From regressional analysis, for unemployment rate to drop, the minimum real GDP growth rate required, on average, should be 3.4%. But the actual growth rate in 2011 was only 1.6%.  So why have we been witnessing a drop of unemployment rate anyway?

The breakdown of this long-run relationship may be due to the drop of participation rate in labor market. The real unemployment rate, taking participation rate into account, should be much higher.

As shown in the graph, the current change of unemployment rate would require a much faster real GDP growth, at roughly 5%, three times of the current growth rate.

 

 

 

What’s wrong with America’s job engine?

A nice video/graphical analysis from WSJ:

US Unemployment Landscape

The Southern states began to catch up, in a bad way: with unemployment rates rising to the similar level of those dire states that were hit hard by housing bubble –  this is not good.

 

Analysis of April Employment Report

John Silvia:

David Rosenberg:

Job Perspective of America’s Lost Decade

I posted a little while ago on America’s lost decade in terms of investment returns (also this post), here below is a nice graph summarizing job creation by decade: The past decade was clearly a lost decade in job creation. Also read my previous post on this here.

Firms with job openings

Percentage of firms with job openings:

(click to enlarge)

John Ryding: Unemployment to peak out in 4-5 months

Interview of John Ryding, Chief Economist of RDQ Economics. He painted a more optimistic picture of US unemployment outlook. For the economy to create jobs, weekly initial jobless claims need to come down to 400k range from the current 500k. The recent decline is 5,000 claims per week, so it will take 20 weeks to reach 400k level. Then unemployment rate will come down.

The question is how fast the job creation will be. It’ll be a big problem for the US economy if 9-10% unemployment rate stays there for a long time.


(click on the image to play the video interview)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

David Rosenberg: Unemployment rate to reach 13%

David Rosenberg, former Chief economist at Merrill Lynch, explains convincingly why he thinks the unemployment rate may peak at 13%, eventually. He points out unemployment rate becomes a coincidental indicator, not lagging indicator, of the economy during credit deleveraging cycle.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]