Home » United States

Category Archives: United States

Search within blog:

Subscribe RSS feed

September 2022
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Why most Americans don’t feel the recession is over?

During the past five years, I have seen many similar charts.  But this one really stands out as the best story-teller.

us income growth by income group 90 vs. 10

(source: vox.com)

Is Larry Summers quitting Obama?

Larry Summers may leave his current post at the end of the year.

Watch this video analysis:

What the US needs to achieve in healthcare reform

This graph tells more than thousands words.

(click to enlarge; source: Sam Cook at Columbia U)

Denmark spent half of the US does, but achieved the same outcome.  Coverage is just one aspect of the reform, more attention should be paid to how to run the system more efficiently.

Market has changed direction

David Rosenberg looks at the market direction from its 120-day change.

It clearly shows the market peaked in last August, then went sideway until last December; from last December, the market has been trending down.

This bear market rally was so long that surprised every professional investor. Now it’s the time to reckon.

(click to enlarge)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Paulson: the US was very close to financial collapse

Paulson’s interview with Bloomberg.

At one point, he talked to his wife, Wendy, on the cell phone, “I am scared…pray for me.”

Also watch my previous post on Inside the Meltdown from Frontline.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Housing price and migration in the US

Housing prices and migration are negatively correlated.

The sharp drop in house prices in states like Florida, Neveda sharply slowed down the previous robust migration into America’s sunbelt.

Texas emerged largely unscathed after this crisis and is the biggest winner in terms of net inflow of population.

(click to enlarge)

full text here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Too tough to save

Mega banks survived because of government bailout and they are believed to be “too big to fail“.
What about smaller regional banks, with heavy investment in CRE? It seems that they are too tough to save.

Source: WSJ

For the first time in the credit crisis, the government may have run into a problem that is too tough to bail out: commercial real estate.

The Treasury and the Federal Reserve have spent hundreds of billions of dollars shoring up the residential-mortgage market. By comparison, the government’s strategy for dealing with commercial real estate looks slight. And it may have no choice but to step aside and allow an adjustment that could slow the economy and expose banks and bond investors to big losses from the $3.4 trillion outstanding in commercial real-estate debt.

[CREHERD]

Why is this sector so rescue-resistant? First, helping commercial-mortgage holders doesn’t buy votes the way helping homeowners does. Second, look at where commercial real estate lies in the banking sector. In theory, the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, should have given banks the capital to absorb loan losses, including those on commercial real-estate debt. TARP injections, along with Fed-run stress tests, helped big banks with more than $100 billion in assets. But those lenders held only 29% of the $1.84 trillion of commercial real-estate debt on bank balance sheets in the second quarter, according to Foresight Analytics.

Yes, smaller banks also tapped TARP, but they weren’t stress-tested in the same way, and thus are less likely to have raised enough equity to deal with commercial real estate. Banks with $1 billion to $10 billion of assets had $450 billion in commercial real-estate exposure in the second quarter, equivalent to more than 330% of Tier 1 capital. For the largest banks, that ratio was 99%, according to Foresight.

Regulators could encourage smaller banks to stock up on capital for a commercial real-estate meltdown. Yet Treasury figures show the number of banks taking TARP capital has dwindled to a trickle.

Regulators appear to be hoping that a partial recovery in commercial real-estate values could reduce the problem. They recently issued guidelines that make it easier to keep underwater loans out of bad-loan tallies, as well as encourage banks to restructure, rather than foreclose on, problem commercial mortgages. Indeed, Foresight estimates that for commercial real-estate bank loans maturing between 2010 and 2014, a 10% rise in values could cut the proportion underwater from 68% to 37%.

But even if prices did rise, banks likely are to want to pare exposure. They have little motivation to refinance commercial real-estate loans.

And investors shouldn’t expect any meaningful revival of the $700 billion market in bonds backed by commercial real-estate loans, even with the Fed providing leverage to buy such securities. While popular during the bubble, these securitizations lack the sort of attributes, like large pools of loans with similar terms, to generate strong demand in saner times, said Joseph Mason of Louisiana State University.

Commercial real estate looks too tough to save.

Bank failures in historical perspective:

(graph courtesy of calculatedrisk)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Break up big banks

To big to fail?
Moral hazard?
Bailout money flowing to Wall Street?
The solution: break them up!


(click to enlarge; graph courtesy of James Chanos)

Interview of Simon Johnson, former chief economist of IMF. (20 mins interview from Bloomberg)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]