Home » 2008 » February » 23

Daily Archives: February 23, 2008

Vicious circle in the economy

I learnt the theory of vicious circle in economic development, the situation where people are trapped in poverty and can’t get out of it. It’s hard to imagine the phrase being applied to a rich country like United States. Well, here we go: when US consumers and investors get too complacent with credit and risk, this is what they got.

Housing Cycle Is Caught in Vicious Circle

By SCOTT PATTERSON, WSJ

Economists have a term to describe what it means when things keep going from bad to worse: negative-feedback loop. One day’s problems create a broad set of behaviors that only make the problems worse.

[Chart]

Consider housing. As home prices fall, more families see the values of their homes decline to less than the amount of money they have to pay back on their mortgages. That gives them an incentive to walk away from their mortgages and leave their homes empty, which puts more downward pressure on home prices, drawing more households into the loop.

Housing turmoil, in turn, causes consumers to pull back, hurting the broader economy, which puts more downward pressure on home prices. Banks, worried about mortgages going bad, tighten lending standards, shutting some new buyers out of the market and further depressing home prices.

Negative-feedback loops can be pernicious when an economy depends heavily on borrowed money. Total outstanding household debt rose to $13.6 trillion by the third quarter of 2007 from $7.2 trillion at the beginning of 2001 — a 10% annual growth rate. Mortgage borrowing more than doubled in this stretch. One out of every seven dollars of disposable income earned by Americans now goes toward paying down debt — near a record.

Corporate borrowing was modest for most of the decade, then started rising at double-digit rates in 2006 and 2007, amid a wave of private-equity buyouts and debt-financed share buybacks. Meantime, Wall Street juices returns by making investments with borrowed money.

Yale economist John Geanakoplos’s concept of the leverage cycle shows how negative-feedback loops are driving today’s economy. When times are good, credit is ample, causing the economy to heat up. When the cycle shifts, lenders tighten standards and become more demanding about the collateral they hold, feeding into the negative-feedback loops hitting the economy.

He says shifts in this cycle can happen suddenly, catching investors and policy makers off guard. “When the world seems more uncertain, everyone wants a lot of collateral and the economy goes from highly leveraged to no leverage very quickly,” he says.

“When things go bad, people have to sell assets to raise collateral,” says Gregg Berman, co-head of the risk management unit of RiskMetrics Group. Selling reduces the value of the very assets borrowers have used as collateral against loans — such as homes. “The more leverage is built into the system, the more the cascade effect is magnified,” Mr. Berman says.

Individual banks might be acting rationally when demanding more or better collateral. Trouble is, when every lender does this at once, it becomes self-destructive, triggering shock waves that threaten the banks themselves.

The trick for policy makers is to break the loop. “A macroeconomic downturn tends to diminish the value of many forms of collateral…reinforcing the propagation of the adverse-feedback loop,” Federal Reserve Governor Frederic Mishkin said in a January speech. Aggressive Fed interest-rate cuts help by reducing the cost of all of this borrowing.

The psychology of risk aversion behind these negative loops is hard to alter once it sets in. That is why breaking the chain this time could be harder than anyone expected.

Diverging performance not justified

The author of below wsj article seemed to suggest stock relative to bond is overvalued. I agree current equity market could be overvalued, if you take into consideration of potential earnings declines in a recession environment. But what I do not see is why stock and bond should go in tandem with each other, especially when bond market is in a temporary shock or panic.
 
 

Mind the Gap Between Stocks And Bonds

By MARK GONGLOFF, WSJ

The stock market is peppier than the credit market. One of them might be in denial.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average has fallen about 8% since credit problems first started bubbling up last June, but has rebounded lately as investors bet on a recovery in the second half.

[Chart]

The credit market's pain, meanwhile, has been far deeper and is getting worse. Markit's CDX investment grade index, which tracks the cost of insurance against investment-grade corporate defaults, has swollen more than 330% since June. Spreads on leveraged loans, which are made to companies with junk ratings, are at their worst levels of the crisis, having widened by about 184% since June, according to the Standard & Poor's/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index.

Swap spreads, another measure of risk aversion in credit markets, are pointing in the same direction. Swap spreads are essentially a measure of the difference between buying a safe government bond and making a riskier loan to a bank. The gap widens when lenders are pulling in their horns.

For example, the 10-year swap spread — the gap between 10-year Treasury yields and market rates derived from the London interbank offered rate — has ballooned above three-quarters of a percentage point, what Michael Darda, chief economist at MKM Partners, calls "crisis" territory. The spread hit that level last July and November, heralding credit-market meltdowns and, a little later, stock-market swoons.

That chain of events may not unfold again this time, Mr. Darda suggests, saying stock prices already reflect fairly dismal credit conditions. The Federal Reserve has flooded the system with money, and a viable bond-insurance rescue plan could shrink spreads and improve credit conditions.

The trouble is that neither the Fed nor would-be bond-insurance rescuers can magically make lenders feel giddy about lending money again. Big bubbles tend to end badly, take time to unwind, and claim a lot of victims. That applies to credit bubbles, too.

The credit market could be ringing false alarms. But it could also be foreshadowing more damage yet to come in stocks.