Home » 2009 (Page 55)

Yearly Archives: 2009

Search within blog:

Subscribe RSS feed

April 2026
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Migration in the US: Why people move less

The economic theory goes: if people buy house rather than rent, they tend to move less; during the current housing crisis, a lot of people bought the house at the peak, in may cases, their mortgages are also under water, which provides even less incentives for people to move.

But America needs a more dynamic mobile workforce in the competitive global economy — These are all unintended consequences of a historical housing bubble.

source: WSJ

Migration around the U.S. slowed to a crawl last year, especially for this decade’s boom towns, as a weak housing market and job insecurity forced many Americans to stay put.

Demographers say the dropoff in migration, shown in Census data to be released Thursday, is among the sharpest since the Great Depression. It marks the end of what Brookings Institution demographer William Frey calls a “migration bubble.”

As asset values rose fairly steadily in the past decade, Americans young and old moved around the country in search of jobs or better weather. In many cases, people living in higher-cost housing markets such as San Francisco and New York cashed in their real-estate winnings and moved to outlying counties, or to states like Florida and Nevada, hoping to find a cheaper house and pocket the difference. Now, “people are hanging tight; they’re too scared to do anything,” said Mr. Frey.

The data, covering the one-year period until July 1, 2008, show this effect across U.S. counties and metropolitan areas — another sign of how this recession has spared few industries or regions.

Migration typically slows during recessions. But in past downturns, the slowdown has been more regional in scope, with workers fleeing weaker job markets for places where companies were still hiring. In the deep 1980s recession, for instance, laid-off auto workers fled the industrial Midwest for energy-rich states in the South with more plentiful jobs.

What’s unique this time is migration has slowed almost everywhere. The sharpest year-to-year changes were among what demographers call “domestic migrants,” people who moved within the U.S. That doesn’t count population changes that result from births, deaths or immigration.

Older metro areas such as New York and San Francisco, which have seen residents move to faster-growing areas, are now losing fewer people. Cities in the formerly hot housing markets such as Nevada and Florida are seeing fewer arrivals and, in some cases, more people moving out than in.

At the local level, more people are staying in the city and postponing their move to the suburbs. In 2005-06, metropolitan areas with one million or more people saw a net 688,000 people leave their core counties. In 2007-08, a net 336,000 left, according to an analysis of Census data by Kenneth Johnson, senior demographer at the University of New Hampshire’s Carsey Institute.

“Fewer people are leaving the urban cores to go to the suburbs,” said Mr. Johnson.

International migration slowed moderately, according to the Census data. In 2005-06, the country absorbed a net of about one million immigrants. In 2007-08, that fell to a net gain of 890,000. The slowdown in international migration was sharpest in outer suburban areas, where the housing market has in general been worse than in core cities or closer-in suburbs.

The slumping economy, as well as depressed prices of just about every kind of asset, is behind many of these decisions to stay put. Jeff Fallon, a managing partner at a private-equity firm in Cleveland, made two trips to Florida last year looking to buy a home in the Sarasota area. But with the stock market down and real-estate prices still falling, Mr. Fallon decided to hold off for a bit.

“I was looking at a substantial amount of our personal wealth disappear as the stock market spiraled down,” he said. “It certainly had a lot of bearing on whether or not I was willing to invest in a second home.”

[Las Vegas strip]

If the migration slump continues, it could slow down economic recovery in depressed housing markets such as Las Vegas.

Decisions like his help explain why a net 15,000 people left the Cleveland area for somewhere else in the U.S. in 2007-2008, compared with a net of 21,000 between 2005 and 2006. Sarasota, meanwhile, saw a net increase of 2,500 residents from inside the U.S., compared with as many as 20,000 during the boom years.

The Census data show that the biggest falloffs were in the worst housing markets. In 2007-2008, the Phoenix area gained a net 51,000 domestic migrants, about half as many as two years ago.

Las Vegas increased by a net 14,000 domestic migrants, two-thirds fewer than two years ago. California’s Riverside-San Bernardino metro area, a once-booming market that has been hammered by foreclosures and job losses, lost domestic migrants for the first time since 1995-1996.

The migration slowdown, if it persists, could further delay the economic recovery in depressed housing markets such as Phoenix and Las Vegas. These places generally have a larger amount of unsold homes, and a disproportionate share of the economy is dependent on construction and other real estate-related trades.

Economists say the housing-centric economies will need to reduce their stock of unsold homes before any meaningful economic recovery takes place. That’s hard to do when fewer people are moving there.

Hedge Fund Performance

(source: Bloomberg)

report from FT:

Hedge fund liquidations hit a record high last year as poor performance and funding pressure, amid dire market conditions, forced almost 1500 funds, or 15 per cent of the industry, out of business.

Most of the damage was done in the second half of the year, according to latest figures from Hedge Fund Research, the data provider.

Investors withdrew a record $150bn from hedge funds in the fourth quarter alone and, 778 funds liquidated during that period, more than doubling the previous quarterly record of 344, set in the third quarter last year.

The total number of liquidations last year was 1,471, an increase of more than 70 per cent from the previous full year record set in 2005.

The fourth quarter also saw a sharp drop in the number of new funds launched, with just 56 launches versus 117 in the third quarter. In spite of the market conditions, more than 650 funds began operations over the course of the year.

On a net basis, the total number of hedge funds declined by about 8 per cent to 9,284.

The funds of hedge funds industry also suffered, with more than 275 funds of hedge funds liquidated last year, another record.

A separate survey by Absolute Return magazine, an industry publication, found that more than 200 hedge funds or fund families in the Americas shuttered or began to liquidate in 2008. At the height of their success, these funds managed combined assets of $84bn.

Three of the top 10 funds that closed last year were Madoff feeder funds, including Fairfield Greenwich Group’s Fairfield Sentry Fund, the biggest casualty of 2008 with an estimated $6.9bn in losses.

Gabriel Capital Group and Ascot Partners, two funds controlled by hedge fund manager Ezra Merkin, represented an estimated $3.3bn in assets connected to Madoff. Tremont Group’s Rye family of funds, which included more than 10 vehicles, may have lost more than $3.1bn, according to Absolute Return. Other vehicles that got caught up in the Madoff scheme include Kingate Management’s Kingate Global fund, with a reported $2.7bn affected, and Maxam Capital’s Absolute Return fund, which has $280m with Madoff.

The research also notes that the number of closed or liquidating funds would likely have been far higher had so many hedge funds had not suspended redemptions or placed loss-making or illiquid positions in side pockets or special vehicles.

Fed’s action sharply drove down dollar

Fed’s new purchasing plan of over $1 trillion mortgage-back securities and long-term treasuries makes investors fret about the prospect of dollar. US dollar was driven down sharply today, the 3rd largest decline in recent history.

Dollardeclines1

(graph courtesy of Bespoke Investments)

And gold was up sharply, for almost $50:

WSJ reacts to the Fed’s decision:

The problem with desperate measures: They can end up stoking fear, not confidence.

That’s the main risk with Federal Reserve’s shock and awe tactic of buying $300 billion in longer-term Treasurys and up to $1.25 trillion of mortgage-backed securities issued Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The 10-year Treasury jumped, causing the yield to fall almost half a percentage point to 2.53%. But two key fear indicators immediately flashed red: Gold soared 6%, and the dollar weakened.

It’s highly unusual for a central bank to print money to buy large amounts of financial assets. Such unorthodoxy succeeds only if its purchases are temporary — and sufficient to kick start credit markets and the economy.

Any sign their impact is fleeting would raise expectations of further buying. If the Fed responds and balloons its balance sheet further, inflation fears intensify, hurting the dollar and pushing gold even higher.

The Fed’s $300 billion would account for around 28% of government issuance in the next six months according to Barclays Capital. To keep yields low beyond that might mean even heavier spending. The Fed’s decision Wednesday to ratchet up the purchase of mortgage-backed securities underscores its willingness to keep spending.

Investors should track the relationship between the dollar and Treasury yields. Ultra-loose monetary policy can debase the currency. That means foreigners, with around half of all outstanding Treasurys, could demand higher returns.

Yields are now artificially low because of Fed’s proposed intervention. That might push investors into riskier assets — something the Fed wants. It could also scare foreign investors, who are needed to fund the ballooning fiscal deficit.

Reaction to Fed decision

China Holding…

Now you understand why China’s premier Wen is “worried”.


(click to enlarge; graph courtesy of Brad Setser)

AIG’s counterparties

Source: NYT

Bill Gross of PIMCO is a winner

The Fed is buying $750 billion mortgage-backed securities, and $300 billion long-term treasuries. And Bill Gross’s bond fund, which is a big buyer of agency-backed securities, is surely a winner.


Fed Statement

Release Date: March 18, 2009

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in January indicates that the economy continues to contract. Job losses, declining equity and housing wealth, and tight credit conditions have weighed on consumer sentiment and spending. Weaker sales prospects and difficulties in obtaining credit have led businesses to cut back on inventories and fixed investment. U.S. exports have slumped as a number of major trading partners have also fallen into recession. Although the near-term economic outlook is weak, the Committee anticipates that policy actions to stabilize financial markets and institutions, together with fiscal and monetary stimulus, will contribute to a gradual resumption of sustainable economic growth.

In light of increasing economic slack here and abroad, the Committee expects that inflation will remain subdued. Moreover, the Committee sees some risk that inflation could persist for a time below rates that best foster economic growth and price stability in the longer term.

In these circumstances, the Federal Reserve will employ all available tools to promote economic recovery and to preserve price stability. The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and anticipates that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period. To provide greater support to mortgage lending and housing markets, the Committee decided today to increase the size of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet further by purchasing up to an additional $750 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities, bringing its total purchases of these securities to up to $1.25 trillion this year, and to increase its purchases of agency debt this year by up to $100 billion to a total of up to $200 billion. Moreover, to help improve conditions in private credit markets, the Committee decided to purchase up to $300 billion of longer-term Treasury securities over the next six months. The Federal Reserve has launched the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility to facilitate the extension of credit to households and small businesses and anticipates that the range of eligible collateral for this facility is likely to be expanded to include other financial assets. The Committee will continue to carefully monitor the size and composition of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet in light of evolving financial and economic developments.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke; Charles L. Evans; Donald L. Kohn; Jeffrey M. Lacker; Dennis P. Lockhart; Daniel K. Tarullo; Kevin M. Warsh; and Janet L. Yellen.

World Bank cuts China’s growth to 6.5% for 2009

Source: WSJ

BEIJING — The World Bank cut its forecast for China's growth this year to 6.5%, below Beijing's target of around 8%, and cautioned that China should be prudent about expanding its stimulus this year as it may need to save its ammunition for 2010.

The bank now projects China's consumer price index, the country's key inflation gauge, will rise a mere 0.5% this year, compared with its previous forecast for a 2% increase.

The bank said February's CPI drop didn't necessarily signal "problematic" deflation, with core prices and wages, as well as output, declining in tandem, but cautioned that given the global economic weakness and potential overcapacity in China, "problematic deflation is a risk."

The bank lowered its forecast for China's GDP growth from its previous estimate of 7.5%, mostly due to the worsening global economy.

Government investment and consumption will help growth this year, it said. But policy makers can do more to spur private consumption and improve social programs to ensure that short-term growth targets don't undermine the work needed to rebalance the world's third-largest economy, the World Bank said.

Louis Kuijs, senior economist of the World Bank, said China's year-to-year economic growth will likely be weakest in the early part of 2009. Mr. Kuijs said declines in Chinese exports may have bottomed in February, but full-year exports will likely shrink significantly from last year. "Overall they remain very grim," he said.

Chinese exports in February fell 25.7% from a year earlier, down for the fourth month running and a sharper decline than in January.

Mr. Kuijs said it is not in China's interests to significantly depreciate the yuan as the country will not gain a lot in terms of exports by doing this. He said he doesn't expect China to move in this direction.

The bank said government-influenced direct expenditure will account for 4.9 percentage points of total GDP growth, the bank said.

The bank said China's fiscal deficit will rise to 3.2% of its GDP this year, a forecast slightly higher than the Chinese government's own estimate of nearly 3% due to the bank's lower GDP growth forecast.

Much of China's deficit is a result of the government's four trillion yuan (around $585 billion) infrastructure-focused stimulus plan, which was announced in November and will run through 2010.

The bank said that Beijing should be prudent about further expansion of its fiscal stimulus this year as it may need to widen its deficit in 2010 if the global slowdown isn't reversed.

Mr. Kuijs urged China to focus more on consumption-oriented fiscal spending and improve the domestic social safety net.

"Looking ahead, we think that there are limits to how much the government can beef up investment and infrastructure-oriented stimulus packages in the official manner," he said. "Given that China will continue to grow even in the very weak climate, it may make just as much sense to not go for the second or third general fiscal stimulus."

The bank's new overall growth rate estimate is below Beijing's target of around 8%, and down from last year's actual growth of 9%, which snapped five straight years of double-digit growth in China.

But the World Bank said that while the growth rate projected for this year is "significantly lower" than China's potential growth rate, this isn't likely to jeopardize China's economy or social stability.

"I don't want to be too gloomy. We do see the world economy recovering in the second half of 2009 and also a lot of strength in China's economy," said David Dollar, the World Bank's country director for China. "So, we see China as a relative bright spot in a rather gloomy global economic picture."

The World Bank estimated China's foreign-exchange reserves, the world's largest, will rise to $2.376 trillion by the end of this year, an increase of $425 billion. In 2008, the country's forex reserves rose by $420 billion.

It said China shouldn't worry about the slowing pace in the accumulation of foreign-exchange reserves and estimated China's current account surplus to rise to $425 billion this year, from an estimated $416 billion last year.